Dear Mr Ash ji :
I have gone through your earlier mail, as also to-day's, and matters
stand clarified, and your guidelines shall be followed. I donot get
fooled, and your clarification for your mail ID is OK.
There is one suggestion that you start a service to obtain RTI
informations for the public at large against a nominal charge of say
65/- where RTI Fee is Rs 50, and Rs 15, other places with fee at Rs
10, Because bureaucrats incharge (SPIO's) of RTI services in most
Departments are reluctant to provide honest and complete and timely
informations to general public or individuals.Label of the IAC shall
create productive deterrent and citizens can get much better results
and in time.
This can be centralized at one place, or spread out state wise,
entrusting jobs to a State office bearer to adjust charges to make the
service financially self viable.
Such applications and the progress, and final informations obtained be
put on the IAC Website, for many people requiring same or similar
information can be benefitted, and others encouraged, and most of all
give a healthy and service outlook to the IAC movement.
Secondly, IAC should obtain informations from State Information
Commissioners to find out the nos of Appeals decided, and nos of
defaulters fined.because, I donot have the data right now – but half
an year back, I found the % of defaulters fined were dismissal and
very low Thereafter, IAC should write to SIC's to improve their
working, by implementing the punishments / penalties strictly as per
provisions of the Act, because in my own case, even delays at the
level of State Commissioner orders were also condoned against no
reasons or explanations.
Secondly, an issue can be taken up that for appeals against SIC's, the
law provides no relief, because even against orders of the SIC, the
Central Information Commissions flatly refuses to entertain stating
that the appeal against order of the SIC lies with the State
Information itself, where either the person complained against is
asked to hear and decide the appeal or some one junior Commissioner is
asked to hear and decide the appeal against order of his own seniors.
Thirdly, the RTI Act 2005 law is silent who benefits from the Rs 250
per day or maximum of Rs 25,000 per case, the amount should frankly go
to the applicant, who has been harassed and put to expenses going all
the way to attend one, second, third and final appeal at State
Capital. The matter should be taken up and proper guidelines got
issued through Central Information Commission,
SurajParkash
On 11/8/12, Ash IAC-Media <ash.indiaagainstcorruption@gmail.com> wrote:
> *Dear SurajParkashji*
>
> In your email you had added a line
>
> ">> PS. Rather I do not find your mail ID
>>> ash.indiaagainstcorruption@gmail.com
>>> anywhere on the IAC list. Kindly verify and confirm
>>>"
>
> My email ID is not on that IAC list because I am not a local IAC
> Coordinator like you. *I am the National Spokeperson for IAC*.
>
> All the email IDs IAC has been putting out in public domain are quickly
> getting spammed and overloaded within 2 or 3 days. E-mails are not being
> replied for weeks at a time because of spam and "suggestions" and
> "complaints" from all over India.
>
> In case you have any doubt, you can also send any email to our 3 official
> email IDs mentioned in this Press Release IAC issued in Hindustan Times
> Delhi just to satisfy yourself.
>
> http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/Foxed-by-fake-e-mail-IAC-sends-out-a-disclaimer/Article1-949177.aspx
>
> My other email ID is ash.ashwati2012@gmail.com Please cut and paste this
> yourself carefully from HT story and send me an email. Don't get fooled by
> another email ID opened by hackers which is
> *ash*.*aswathi2012*@**<ash.aswathi2012@gmail.com>
> *gmail.com* and being circulated by Congress agents like some Mr. Prem Gaba
> on blogspot
>
> http://rajeev2004.blogspot.in/2012/10/the-bloody-iac-has-already-split-iac-re.html
>
> If you still have any doubt, please always carry your resignation letter in
> your pocket.
>
> *Ash
> National Spokesperson, IAC
> *
>
> On 11/8/12, Ash IAC-Media <ash.indiaagainstcorruption@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Dear SurajParkashji
>>
>> Let me first apologise to you. But please understand the tremendous
>> difficulties we are working under. Immediately on your email getting
>> into public domain IAC received many enquirys from media if we
>> endorsed your statements. As we were unable to find your other email
>> ID in our database we immediately put out a clarification to our
>> coordinators and also the IAC media list saying you were not our
>> Coordinator. Luckily, one of of our coordinators who knows you
>> personally called me and gave your details. Within 25 minutes I
>> personally ensured that a second email was sent out informing that you
>> are our actually our IAC coordinator.
>>
>> Do you understand what embarrassment incidents like this cause for us.
>> Please always remember that we are now going to be a political party.
>> All those old days and old ways are gone. Please keep your emails and
>> talks always to be "politically correct". If you still have any
>> problems, or are unhappy with IAC decision to form political party
>> Arvindji can easily appoint other IAC coordinators.
>>
>> Your case has been personally reviewed, All your selfless worker
>> excuses won't work. IAC has taken a decision to go political. Either
>> you agree and be disciplined and voice your views privately in mailing
>> lists we are making for you, or you can leave. Also please stop
>> promoting your private businesses in your emails - we are getting too
>> many complaints.
>>
>> Please put bad thoughts that IAC will become a dictatorship out from
>> your mind. Right to Recall (RTR) is a non-negotiable issue for IAC.
>> IAC is going to be political and IAC will also be honest. The 2 are
>> not mutually exclusive.
>>
>> In future all emails are only to be sent over this mailing list. We
>> are adding your other email ID also within 4 hours. Messages will be
>> moderated for unacceptable content. Delays in replying beyond 24 hours
>> will not be tolerated.
>>
>> Ash
>> National Spokesperson, IAC
>>
>> On 11/8/12, SurajParkash <tutejasp@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Dear Ashwati Muralidharan ji
>>>
>>> I have read your post, and wish to know reasons for your annoyance on
>>> public platform, except that my email id sptutejasp@gmail.com was
>>> overloaded, and mails were getting delayed or lost, I changed same to
>>> tutejssp@gmail.com You could simply check on my mobile and seek
>>> clarification for anything not to your feelings. Why term the mail ID
>>> or person as fake ?
>>>
>>> Simply and just because due to technical reasons my mail ID has
>>> changed, do you feel better and suggest such people should leave the
>>> movement ?
>>>
>>> People are discussing the issue of corruption honestly with many
>>> divergent views, ideas and proposals, better than to point out any
>>> idea not to your liking directly, should you
>>> publicly start degrading an anti corruption activits and disturb the
>>> movement.
>>>
>>> IAC already has many enemies mostly from amongst Congress and BJP
>>> people, why unknowingly add more to them or create fissures amongst
>>> our own tribe ?
>>>
>>> Kindly note that we are a democracy, and only when people come out
>>> honestly and fearlessly - the movement will relegate into virtual
>>> dictatorships as already in Congress or BJP where both leaderships do
>>> not find any thing wrong with Salman Khurshid or Gadkari, and are
>>> rewarding or giving clean chits. Do you desire IAC to turn into such a
>>> close fisted dictatorial movement and become another Congress or BJP -
>>> infested with corruptions all the way ?
>>>
>>> What if more persons start writing nasty things against one or more
>>> members of IAC from any email ID ? Why create such a wrong precedent ?
>>> If such un-warranted comments without verifications are put on public
>>> domain, realise we are selfless workers, and not hardened poltical and
>>> corrupt people, any sensitive person would stop cooperating with IAC
>>> and get out.
>>>
>>> With kind regards.
>>>
>>> SurajParkash
>>>
>>>
>>> PS. Rather I donot find your mail ID
>>> ash.indiaagainstcorruption@gmail.com
>>> anywhere on the IAC list. Kindly verify and confirm
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/7/12, Ash IAC-Media <ash.indiaagainstcorruption@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> IAC's mail ID for Surajparkash Tuteja, IAC Ambala, is
>>>> "sptuteja@gmail.com".In
>>>> future only use your registered email IDs which are published on IAC
>>>> website to avoid such confusion.
>>>>
>>>> IAC coordinators must not exchange emails which can be misused against
>>>> IAC.
>>>> All such kind of emails should only be exchanged using mailing list
>>>> facility which will have the updated email IDs and emails with
>>>> unacceptable
>>>> content will be deleted.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 12:42 AM, Ash IAC-Media <
>>>> ash.indiaagainstcorruption@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dear Magan bhai
>>>>>
>>>>> URGENT
>>>>>
>>>>> Please dont entertain Suraj Prakash or reply his email. It is a fake
>>>>> email ID. He is purposely saying wrong things and claiming to be of
>>>>> IAC
>>>>> to confuse you. Many other email IDs in his emails are also fake ids
>>>>> to
>>>>> spread virus and get database of.IAC.
>>>>>
>>>>> Only send emails to IAC official email IDs or email IDs IAC
>>>>> coordinators
>>>>> which are confirmed on this list.
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.indiaforyou.in/indiaagainstcorruption/indian_contacts.php
>>>>>
>>>>> Or you can send mail on this list which are all only the confirmed
>>>>> email
>>>>> IDs.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ashwati Muralidharan
>>>
>>
>
--
Dear sir :
Due to technical reasons, kindly note the change of email ID from
tutejasp@gmail.com to ambala.9315879780@gmail.com
9315879780 is also mobile no.
SurajParkash
No comments:
Post a Comment